Complacency Kills in Battle and in Business! Is Your Company Complacent?

Leader guiding those who are carrying them

A business is a living entity.  Like all living entities it requires energy to grow and be healthy.  If you fail to provide energy to any system, it will decay fall into disrepair.  By definition, complacency is a lack of energy.  In the military we say complacency kills!  This is as true in business as it is in battle.

Great Business Leaders Battle Complacency!

I was recently discussing Henkel AG’s outgoing CEO’s track record with a colleague. According to this Dow Jones Business News article, over the past 8 years Kasper Rorsted, Henkel’s former CEO, increased net profit by 60% resulting in the stock price of Henkel more than tripling.  Along the way, Rorsted cut Henkel’s brand offerings by 80%, its work force by 10% and stepped on a great many of the traditions and values.  My colleagues comment to me?

“BUT, isn’t that what we do? Sacrifice employees for profit?…”

The short answer to her question is “No!”  That is a bit like a General saying “we sacrifice soldiers for territory”.  Yes, this tactic is called for under some circumstances but it is a tactic of last resort.  A commander should only order a frontal assault against an entrenched enemy only when there is no option for a flanking maneuver and winning the battle offers a significant strategic or tactical advantage.  Likewise, business leaders should only sacrifice employees when they are so stuck in their ways that there is no other option.

Dioramas depicting the Battle of Bunker Hill courtesy of Dave Palmater under CC license

Military history is replete with examples of commanders that succeeded to capture territory at such a high price in personnel that they effectively lost the battle.  At Bunker Hill 2,200 highly trained British troops routed 1,000 Colonial militia.  It took them 3 assaults and they only prevailed after the Colonials ran out of ammo.  Casualties for the Colonials numbered 400 dead or wounded while the British lost more than 1,000 men.  In business this is the equivalent of the whole sale closing or disposing of divisions to generate cash or quick profits.  Corporate raiders may execute this tactic but management that is looking for sustainable profits should not unless all other options are exhausted.

Great Business Leaders Set High Standards

Fortunately for Henkel, this was not a frontal assault.  Rorsted’s success was not at the expense of Henkel’s employees, the 10% of the work force that was lost was collateral damage.  Rorsted achieved his success by cutting out the 80% of brands that were not performing.  This is an excellent example of the application of the Pareto Principal, where 80% of the result comes from 20% of the effort (Vilfredo Pareto was an Italian mathematician that studied wealth distribution but his findings are broadly applicable).

The fact that Henkel’s net profit increased by 60% while Henkel’s brand offering was reduced by 80% confirms that this 140-year-old company was suffering from complacency.  The Dow article quotes the head of Henkel’s worker’s council stating “I guess it was somewhat leisurely”.  In the same article, Robert Simons, a Harvard Business School Professor, stated “Most employees didn’t see any reason to change.”  Henkel’s employees did not know that they could perform at a higher level.  Rorsted was a true business leader when he gave Henkel a much needed kick in the butt and impressive growth was the result.  What do you need to do to kick your business in the butt?

Are You Leading Your Business into Complacency?

Complacency is an easy trap to fall into.  Most of the businesses I have consulted with over the years are guilty of it but avoiding complacency is easy.

  1. Know your numbers.  I’m always surprised how many business owners don’t pay any attention to their financial statements.  These are literally the telemetry of your business…if they are set up right. Without good financials nothing else matters because you can’t judge how well your company is doing without them.  Proper financials can predict problems ahead of time and give you the ability to be pro-active.  More importantly they are a benchmark to judge the effectiveness of any initiatives or systemic changes.
  2. Periodically revisit your assumptions.  Whether it is how much profit you make on a product or service or how long it takes to produce, test your assumptions.  I once worked for a telecommunications company that believed that if they doubled their cost of equipment they could cover their equipment cost, labor cost, warranty costs and still make money.  They never knew how much the warranty was costing them so they never could test their assumptions.
  3. Be a learning organization.  Whenever something goes wrong, ask yourself why?  Problems are either systemic or personnel in nature.  If they are systemic then change your system to minimize the chance of the problem recurring.  If personnel then ask yourself if the offending employee needs additional training or would they be better off working elsewhere, either within your organization or at another company.
  4. Take decisive action.  If you have good financials, are checking your assumptions and are a learning organization but you aren’t acting on the information you obtain you’re wasting your time.  Don’t fear making a wrong decision, if you are doing everything above then you will see what corrections are needed and tweak your decisions accordingly but you can’t correct a thing if you never take action.

So remember, Complacency Kills so stop being complacent.


More Posts

Special forces in a river

Special Forces part II

As you recall from the previous issue of Locked On Leaders, my wife and I are hooked on the new show Special Forces: The World’s Toughest Test.  This is the show where athletes and celebrities compete by going through a

Read More »
People in a raft battling the surf

What You Can Learn From Reality TV

I know, I missed the entire month of October.  My apologies.  My wife and I got hooked on a new TV show, Special Forces: World’s Toughest Test.  If you haven’t seen it, I would classify it as a unique type

Read More »
Private Michael Spencer, 69th Signal Company, works inside a communications switching van during Exercise GALLANT EAGLE '84.

Is Your Message Really Getting Across?

Is your message really getting across?  I ask this because I had a recent interaction with a team member of one of my clients that forced me to rethink how we communicate.  This particular client is a 100% distributed company. 

Read More »